home
download all data from this site download
U.K. Health Care Jobs U.K.
Canada Health Care Jobs Canada
link to us link
Email a friend email
subscribe to job feeds subscribe
follow us on twitter follow
Health Care Jobs

Health Care Hiring, Medical Jobs

Provider Directories, Physician Lookup

Local City Search for Health Care Providers

FIND THE PERFECT JOB!

  keywords

  location

    
Find A Job Now!
Post Jobs $30 for 30 Days

IMPROVE YOUR
CAREER SKILLS
TODAY!

  

health care commentaries from around the world

Add My Blog

February 11, 2010

Government EHR Program: Unintended Consequences (continued)

11:40 pm

Last week’s EMR Straight Talk, “Government EHR Program: Potentially Harmful Unintended Consequences,” seems to have struck a nerve with readers—based on the number, source, and intensity of the comments. The elevated level of concern is palpable. What I find rewarding is that blogs like EMR Straight Talk are creating a community of physicians who find support for their concerns—concerns that they might have thought were unique to themselves. Several of last week’s comments came from physicians who are not even on our mailing list, which means that their colleagues are sharing the blog, seeking to build support for their beliefs. Most of the comments were submitted by specialist physicians who are getting our message and beginning to speak up about why they do not consider the government’s EHR program relevant for their practices.

Those commenting identified several additional unintended consequences and voiced other concerns, including:

  • Dissatisfaction with templates and the utility of the notes they generate;
  • Failure of the government program to consider the needs of providers;
  • Effect of traditional EHRs on physician productivity;
  • Failure of physician organizations to speak out on behalf of their constituents; and
  • Difficulty of finding the right EHR for a practice.

An interesting comment came from Paul Roemer, who directed concerned readers to his post on HealthsystemCIO.com, in which he suggests that the “meaningful use” dates will be pushed back. He maintains: “Washington created a $40 billion lottery and they are having trouble finding anyone able to purchase tickets.” His contention is that very few providers will be ready or able to take advantage of the incentives, including those who already have implemented a traditional, point-and-click EHR.

What do you think the government should do with its program that is clearly meeting significant and vocal resistance—particularly among specialists and other high-volume physicians? Submit your comments below, and let’s keep the conversation going.

Related posts:

  1. Government EHR Program: Potentially Harmful Unintended Consequences
  2. I am really intrigued by the latest creation from the…
  3. Government Has Heard Tales of EHR Woe—What Will They Do Now?
  4. Physicians and administrators delivered a strong message to President Obama’s…
  5. EHR Realities: From Your Mouth to Government Ears
  6. Over my years in business, I’ve received the usual pieces…

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment



Copyright © Coconut Island Software, Inc.            Contribute to Our Database -- Add or Update Your Listing Jobs by SimplyHired